Perancangan aplikasi multi criteria decision making dalam penerimaan beasiswa kepada dosen studi lanjut STMIK Balikpapan menggunakan metode SAW
Abstract views: 963 , pdf downloads: 693Abstract
Interests and number of STMIK Balikpapan new student enrollments are increasing every year. The balance of the ratio of lecturers to students is one of the most important components in improving the quality and teaching and learning process of a university. Avoiding shortages in the number of lecturers can be realized by providing scholarship programs to alumni and teaching assistants. This study aims to build a multi criteria decision making application that can assist the Head of HRD in the process of receiving scholarships to advanced and effective study lecturers.
The multi criteria decision making application developed in this study uses the SAW method. The implementation of the SAW method includes the process of evaluating the weighting of criteria, evaluating alternative weights, the matrix process, the results of decision making preferences, resulting in the weighting and ranking of each alternative candidate for the scholarship recipient.
The results of the evaluation of multi-criteria application decision making in the study are expected to produce modeling with a high degree of accuracy. The results of the analysis carried out can provide alternative recommendations for prospective scholarship recipients to advanced study lecturers in STMIK Balikpapan.
Downloads
References
[2] Wei, W., Han, J., Kong, J., and Xia, H., “Prediction of the Scholarship Using Comprehensive Development”, Proceedings - 4th International Conference on Enterprise Systems: Advances in Enterprise Systems, ES 2016, 183–188, 2017.
[3] Tsai, J.-P., Cheng, H.-Y., Wang, S.-Y., and Kao, Y.-C., “Multi-criteria decision making method for selection of machine tool. 2010 International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation (3CA), 49–52, 2010.
[4] Chaising, S., “Application of a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for Selecting of Raw Material Supplier for Small and Medium Enterprises”,2017.
[5] Zhang, L., Xu, Y., Yeh, C., He, L., and Zhou, D., “Bi-TOPSIS : A New Multicriteria Decision Making Method for Interrelated Criteria With Bipolar Measurement”, 1–12, 2016.
[6] Kittur, J., “Criteria Decision Making Methods”, 2015.
[7] Rezaei, A., Shayestehfar, M., Hassani, H., and Mohammadi, M. R. T., “Assessment of the metals contamination and their grading by SAW method: a case study in Sarcheshmeh copper complex”, Kerman, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(4), 3191–3205, 2015.
[8] Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., and Leang, T.-F., “Decision Support Systems And Intelligent Systems (Edisi 7)”, 2005.
[9] Roscher, K., Jiru, J., and Knorr, R., “Low-delay forwarding with multiple candidates for VANETs using multi-criteria decision making”. IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference, VNC, 2017.
[10] A. V. Michailidou, C. Vlachokostas, and N. Moussiopoulos, “Interactions between climate change and the tourism sector: Multiple-criteria decision analysis to assess mitigation and adaptation options in tourism areas,” Tour. Manag., vol. 55, pp. 1–12, 2016.
[11] C. L. Chen and Y. P. Bau, “Establishing a multi-criteria evaluation structure for tourist beaches in Taiwan: A foundation for sustainable beach tourism,” Ocean Coast. Manag., vol. 121, pp. 88–96, 2016.
[12] N. H. Cahyana and A. . Aribowo, “Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Untuk Menentukan Prioritas Proyek,” Telematika, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147 – 152, 2014
[13] Kittur, J., “Optimal generation evaluation using SAW, WP, AHP and PROMETHEE multi - Criteria decision making techniques”. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy, TAP Energy 2015, 304–309, 2015.
