ABOUT ARADHANA JOURNAL
Aradhana Journal is a journal published by the INFOTEKS (Informasi Teknologi Komputer dan Sains) , with e-ISSN: xxxx-xxxx and p-ISSN: xxx-xxxx. Aradhana Journal was first published in October 2024 and has a publishing period fourth in a year, namely in January, April, July, and October. The contents of Aradhana Journal include Participatory Action Research, Asset-based Community Development, Community Based Research, Service Learning, and Community Development.
All articles in Aradhana Journal will be processed by the editor through the Online Journal System (OJS), and the author can monitor the entire process in the members area. The articles published in soft copy form, which are available as open access for educational, research and library purposes, and beyond that purpose, the editorial board of the Aradhana Journal is not responsible for copyright infringement.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Author(s) who publish article in Aradhana Journal, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
The article that has been sent to Aradhana Journal will be through two review process namely pre-review and review. Pre-review process of the article is done by managing director that include:
- Focus and Scope: The article being sent should in accordance with the scope of Aradhana Journal. The article outside the scope of Aradhana Journal will be rejected.
- Plagiarism Check: Plagiarism check and article similarity are done by using google schoolar and itenthicate with maximum score 15%. Article that has similarity check above 15% will be returned to the writer for revision.
- References: references used in the article are minimum 10 references that consist of 80% primary sources and 20% secondary sources. References use APA style and made by using references managing software like Mendeley.
- Template: the submitted article should in accordance with the template in Aradhana Journal which can be seen and downloaded here.
If from the four components, there is something not in accordance, then the article will be returned to the writer to be revised. Writer is given time for seven days to revise the article and send it back.
When the four components in the review process are fulfilled, then the article will be continued to be reviewed by the reviewer through editor. The substances review process is done by two reviewer in Double Blind Peer Review. Reviewer can give recommendation such as:
- Accept Submission: article is accepted to be published without having revision in substances.
- Revision Required: the article with minor revision, article is sent to the writer to be revised (when the writer has sent the revision, article can be accepted to be published)
- Resubmit for Review: the article with major revision. After revision is done by the writer, article is resubmitted to the reviewer to be reviewed again ( maximum three times resubmit), If the article is not quite right in substance after the fourth review, then reviewer is allowed to give recommendation as Decline Submission.
- Resubmit Elsewhere : in substance, article is considered as less suitable and suggested to be submitted into other journal
- Decline Submission: article is rejected by the reviewer to be reviewed with two reasons, (1) reviewer rejects because of a reason (not related to articles substances), then the article is sent to another reviewer. (2) rejected article in substance is considered less suitable to be published in journal.