Application of LightGBM for Agricultural Yield Forecasting from Environmental and Pesticide Inputs

https://doi.org/10.33173/acsie.v6i2.303
  • I Nyoman Darma KotamaOkayama University
  • Anak Agung Surya PradhanaOkayama University

Abstract

Accurate agricultural yield forecasting plays a critical role in supporting food security, resource management, and sustainable farming practices. The increasing availability of environmental and agricultural management data has enabled the adoption of machine learning approaches to improve prediction reliability. However, conventional statistical and learning models often struggle to capture the complex nonlinear relationships between climatic factors and pesticide application patterns. This study proposes the application of the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) for agricultural yield forecasting using integrated environmental and pesticide input features.The main motivation of this research is to develop an efficient and accurate forecasting framework capable of handling high-dimensional agricultural datasets while maintaining strong generalization capability. The proposed model combines environmental variables with pesticide-related indicators to provide a comprehensive representation of crop growth conditions. LightGBM is employed due to its histogram-based learning strategy and leaf-wise tree growth mechanism, which enhance predictive accuracy and computational efficiency.Model performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), along with visual comparison between actual and predicted yield values. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves reliable forecasting performance, with MAE of 63,522.74 kg/ha and RMSE of 82,716.32 kg/ha, indicating effective modeling of nonlinear agricultural dynamics. Future work will focus on integrating remote sensing data, advanced temporal modeling techniques, and explainable artificial intelligence to further enhance prediction accuracy and interpretability.

Keywords

Agricultural Yield Forecasting; LightGBM; Environmental Data; Pesticide Data; Machine Learning

Full Text

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Kamilaris and F. X. Prenafeta-Boldú, “Deep learning in agriculture: A survey,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 147, pp. 70–90, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016
[2] M. Liakos, P. Busato, D. Moshou, S. Pearson, and D. Bochtis, “Machine learning in agriculture: A review,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1–29, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s18082674
[3] G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, and T. Y. Liu, “LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 3146–3154, 2020, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1712.01034
[4] Y. Chen, Y. Zhao, and L. Wang, “Environmental prediction using LightGBM,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 102, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107054
[5] S. Jeong, J. Ko, and J. Kim, “Crop yield prediction using machine learning models,” Agricultural Systems, vol. 184, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102902
[6] R. Chlingaryan, S. Sukkarieh, and B. Whelan, “Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 151, pp. 61–69, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.012
[7] P. Pantazi, D. Moshou, and T. Tamouridou, “Automated crop yield prediction using advanced analytics,” Information Processing in Agriculture, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 399–412, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2020.06.004
[8] A. Benos, D. Tagarakis, and D. Bochtis, “Machine learning and agriculture: A systematic review,” Biosystems Engineering, vol. 214, pp. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.12.005
[9] H. Wang, J. Liu, and Z. Zhang, “Efficient gradient boosting models for large-scale prediction,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 121345–121356, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3109876
[10] M. Abbas, M. Jabbar, M. Ali, and S. Khan, “Crop yield forecasting using ensemble learning techniques,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13073933
[11] S. Sharma and A. Sharma, “Precision agriculture using machine learning approaches,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 330, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129827
[12] Y. Li, X. Wang, and Q. Zhang, “Agricultural prediction with boosting algorithms,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 195, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116599
[13] R. Khaki and L. Wang, “Crop yield prediction using deep neural networks,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 10, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00621
[14] M. Ahmed, M. Hussain, S. Ali, and A. Khan, “Data-driven decision support systems for smart agriculture,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 45721–45735, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267712
[15] J. Liu, Y. Zhang, and K. Chen, “Explainable machine learning for agricultural forecasting,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 218, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108121
[16] T. Elavarasan, P. Durairaj, and K. Krishnamurthy, “Crop yield prediction using machine learning and deep learning models,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 12, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12652-020-02635-1
[17] S. Singh, R. Pandey, and A. Sharma, “Comparative analysis of ensemble learning techniques for crop yield forecasting,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 156489–156502, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3129124
[18] M. Rahman, J. Hasan, and M. Hossain, “Performance evaluation of boosting algorithms for agricultural prediction,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 186, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115811
[19] K. Zhang, Y. Liu, and H. Sun, “Large-scale agricultural yield prediction using LightGBM,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 198, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107120
[20] A. Verma and P. Patel, “Integrating pesticide usage data for crop productivity modeling,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16020891

License

Copyright (c) 2024 ACSIE (International Journal of Application Computer Science and Informatic Engineering)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.